international human resource management and corporate strategic planning

ASSIGNMENT 3: IHRM AND CORPORATE STRATEGIC
PLANNING

Due date:
Time:
Value:
Length:
Based on:

Monday, 14 May 2018
23:59 hours (Australian Eastern Standard Time)
25%
2200 words ± 10%
Modules 1-9
Learning outcomes 1-5
Electronically through MyLO Assignment submission folder

Submission:
Before attempting this assignment:

Ensure the ‘Assessment’ section in this Unit Outline is read and understood. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact the lecturer.

Ensure you understand the assignment question(s) and/or tasks. Once again, consult your
lecturer should you be unsure of any matters.

Note: All students are required to submit this assignment to be eligible to undertake the final
unit examination.

Task description & requirements

Structured Essay

Human resource management has been identified as playing an important role in strategic
planning and business success. This naturally can be applied in the international arena.

Identify a major international corporation, and based on your research, complete the following:

Summarise the corporation’s HRH/IHRM policies and practises as described in corporate
documentation, research papers and the media.
[5 Marks]
Discuss the actual HRM/IHRM challenges faced by this corporation in international markets.
[10 Marks]
Evaluate how effectively the corporation dealt with these challenges and the impact they had
on operation, financial and reputational performance in the countries in question.
[10 Marks]

A minimum of 15 references is required to support your discussion.

See the assessment criteria sheet on the following page for rubric setting out the criteria and the
standards by which your work will be judged.

Department of Maritime and Logistics Management – JNB513 International Human Resource Management 18

Assignment 3 Marking Rubric

Student: ID:
Unit code: JNB513 Unit title: International Human Resource Management
Assessor: Andrew Sertori Date: Mark: /25

Assessment criteria*	HD (High Distinction) 80%-100%	DN (Distinction) 70%-79%	CR (Credit) 60%-69%	PP (Pass) 50%-59%	NN (Fail) 0%-49%
Question 1
1.1 Summary of policies and practices	All policies and practises clearly identified	Most policies and practises clearly identified	Many policies and practises clearly identified	Some policies and practises clearly identified	Too few policies and practises clearly identified
Question 2
2.1 Identify challenges	All challenges identified	Most challenges identified	Main challenges identified	Some challenges identified	Too few challenges identified
2.2 Implication of challenges understood	Implications very well understood	Implications well understood	Implications generally well understood	Implications fairly well understood	Implications not or poorly understood
Question 3
3.1 Response to challenges	Responses extremely well identified and understood	Responses very well identified and understood	Responses well identified and understood	Responses somewhat well identified and understood	Responses not well identified and understood
3.2 Impact evaluated	Impact extremely well understood	Impact very well understood	Impact well understood	Impact acceptably understood	Impact poorly understood
Quality of communication
4.1 Clarity & succinctness of writing	Crystal clear, precise & appropriate Technically error- free	In the main clear & appropriate Technically, mostly error-free	Frequently clear & appropriate Some technical errors	Generally clear & appropriate Numerous technical errors	Generally unclear &/or inappropriate Technically, deficient to the point of distraction
Conformance to prescribed formatting guidelines and referencing standards
5.1 Referencing	Faultless application of the prescribed style Sources acknowledged professionally	Prescribed style applied with few errors Sources in the main acknowledged professionally	Prescribed style applied with some errors Sources reasonably acknowledged professionally	Inconsistent application of prescribed style Significant lapses in appropriately acknowledging sources	Incorrect referencing style Sources poorly acknowledged
5.2 Formatting	Follows all requirements	In the main requirements followed	Requirement acceptably followed	Significantly deviates from requirements	Requirements largely ignored

* Please note that the criteria listed above are not necessarily of equal weighting, nor are they all-inclusive; they give an indication of
your performance. .

Calculate Price

Price (USD)

ORDER NOW

international human resource management and corporate strategic planning

Calculate Price

Writing Services

More Services

Get in Touch